I came across an interesting article at TheServerSide comparing Hibernate and Ruby on Rails. What can I say? I’m taking a fancy to ORM frameworks lately, especially given the number of disparate datasources I work with on a daily basis.
About
devnulled is a blog which caters to software development related issues with a pro-unix and open standards slant. devnulled has been featured on Slashdot, Digg, the Indeed Blog, O'Reilly Hacks, and del.icio.us/popular.
Brandon Harper, the author behind devnulled,
is a Software Engineer primarily working with Java but also dabbles in Python, ColdFusion, FreeBSD, and Linux. He's been
programming since age eight, professionally for over ten years, and has been been published in various industry publications and popular websites.
Brandon also enjoys music, photography, politics, command prompts, and things with wheels a wee bit much.
4 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
The title is misleading: Hibernate is only ORM but Rails is ORM plus MVC + all other layers stack for Web application development. I think the title should be Comparing Hibernate and ActiveRecord on Rails
I titled my entry based on the title of the article, sorry.
Sorry, the comment I made was on the original title too.
If you fancy ORM, don’t forget to have a look at Og (ObjectGraph), another Ruby Object Relational Mapping library. Read a nice tutorial here:
http://www.rubygarden.com/inde.....orial.rdoc
(this tutorial refers to an older version though, and describes the basic features)